top of page

Detroit's Fox Theatre Incident Emphasizes Risks: A Legal Analysis of Venue Safety and Liability

Gunna @Fox Theatre

The Incident


Detroit’s Fox Theatre, with a capacity of over 5,000 seats, recently came under scrutiny following a viral video capturing a wobbling balcony during a concert, where rapper, Gunna, was performing his hit song “umean” to a packed house [see video below]. Such incident not only alarms attendees, but also prompts a reassessment of legal responsibilities and the enforcement of building safety codes. While the theatre's management issued a statement explaining that the balcony's movement was part of its engineered design, the incident raises important questions about building codes, inspections, aging infrastructure, and the legal liabilities surrounding venue safety.


Understanding Building Codes and Regular Inspections


Building Codes: These codes establish minimum construction standards designed to protect public safety. They encompass structural elements, fire safety systems, occupancy limits, accessibility, and more.


The Importance of Inspections: Regular inspections by qualified professionals are essential to verify that a building remains in compliance with codes. The Fox Theatre stated they underwent an inspection in April 2023, but the specifics of that inspection were not made public.


The Risks of Neglect: Failure to follow building codes or address issues found in inspections can have devastating consequences. Fines, enforced closures, and most tragically, potential injuries or loss of life can result.


The Challenge of Aging Infrastructure in the United States


America's Aging Infrastructure: Detroit's Fox Theatre, built in 1928, is a prime example of the infrastructure challenges faced across the United States. Many theaters, stadiums, and other public venues are decades old.


The Cost of Maintenance: Regular maintenance and upgrades are crucial to preserve the integrity of older buildings. Neglecting maintenance can lead to hidden structural weaknesses and raise the risk of incidents.


Proactive vs. Reactive: Investment in preventative maintenance is ultimately less costly than responding to accidents or disasters caused by negligence.


Personal Safety Awareness in Public Spaces


Individual Responsibility: While establishments have a duty of care to provide a safe environment, attendees should also be observant of their surroundings. Notice any signs of disrepair (cracks, leaks, unusual noises) and report concerns to venue staff immediately.


Emergency Preparedness: Know where exits are located and familiarize yourself with the venue's emergency procedures. In the unlikely event of an incident, this knowledge could be lifesaving.


Business Ownership and Liability in Acquiring Aged Structures


Duty of Care: Business owners have a legal and ethical obligation to maintain a reasonably safe environment for customers and employees. This duty extends to addressing potential hazards in structures they operate.


Successor Liability: When a business acquires an older property, it may inherit liability for pre-existing issues, including unresolved building code violations or unknown structural weaknesses.


The Importance of Due Diligence: Before acquiring an older venue, it's essential to conduct thorough inspections and research its maintenance history to identify potential liabilities.


Case Law, Case Study and Legal Precedents


The Station Nightclub Fire (2003, Rhode Island): This tragedy, resulting in 100 deaths, was caused by a combination of factors including overcrowding, flammable soundproofing, and blocked exits. It underscores the disastrous consequences of ignoring fire safety and capacity limits. [State of Rhode Island v. Jeffrey Derderian et al. (2006)]


Kansas City Hyatt Regency Walkway Collapse (1981): Structural design flaws and changes during construction led to the collapse of two walkways, killing 114 people. This case highlights the importance of engineering integrity and adherence to building codes. [Gillum v. Republic Engineering and Manufacturing Co. (1983)]


Fox Theatre's Statement and Broader Implications


The Statement:

"The type of movement seen at the recent Fox Theatre concert is common and expected on free-standing balcony structures, to support audience members actively dancing, as shown during last night’s concert...This capability is an integral part of the balcony’s structural engineering design. Regular inspections, most recently conducted in April, are completed to ensure the integrity and safety of the structure." The Detroit News,

Trust and Transparency: Building public confidence relies on venue owners proactively communicating about safety measures, inspection results, and any necessary maintenance work.


Conclusion


The Fox Theatre incident reminds us that safety in public venues cannot be taken for granted. A combined effort between building owners, inspectors, and the public is required. Adherence to building codes, investing in maintenance, and fostering a culture of safety awareness are essential to prevent future accidents and ensure everyone can enjoy public spaces with peace of mind.



Thoughts?


Have you had experiences that raised building safety concerns? Share your answers and thoughts on this topic in the comments! 



Resources: 

National Institute of Building Sciences: National Institute of Building Sciences

International Code Council: ICC - International Code Council - ICC



*Disclaimer: This blog post provides general information and is not a substitute for obtaining legal advice from a qualified attorney. Building regulations and liability laws are complex and vary by jurisdiction.


Recent Posts

See All

Comments

Rated 0 out of 5 stars.
No ratings yet

Add a rating
bottom of page